On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 03:29:33PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> > On 16/11/2022 11:45, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > I use: > > > spf-milter (the same source as policyd-spf-python) > > > opendkim > > > openarc > > > opendmarc > > > > > > so far in soft mode (no rejections) > > > > > > opendmarc can use results of previous three in its decisions. > > On 20.11.22 08:21, Dominic Raferd wrote: > > Does spf-milter have the same source as policyd-spf-python? It looks to > > me like a completely separate project, based on viaspf (both written in > > Rust). Or did you mean spf-milter-python (Debian package)? > > Sorry, you are correct. > > There was no other spf milter available in debian when I checked. > > Package: pyspf-milter > Source: spf-engine > > Package: postfix-policyd-spf-python > Source: spf-engine There are also Debian packages for policy server versions: postfix-policyd-spf-perl postfix-policyd-spf-python cheers, raf
