>>>>> "Matus" == Matus UHLAR <- fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>> writes:
Matus> On 14.08.22 18:40, tog...@dinamizm.com wrote: >> >> I am using both spamhaus and abusix and must say I am quite happy with the >> results I am getting. Yet every user is different so YMMV. >> >> spamhaus and abusix require registration and they are free to some extent >> ie. depends on the traffic generated to these services. Matus> but which lists? using spamhaus PBL is not viable because it lists Matus> dynamic IP address which can be commonly used by clients. authbl.dq.spamhaus.net and authbl.mail.abusix.zone these are available for registered users and they are free for registered users These authbl lists are to be used for auth enabled ports for submission >> spamrats also have such a service which doesn't require registration AFAIK Matus> I have bad historic experience with spamrats and fwom wht I remember Matus> I'm not the only one. As I said your mileage may vary, for me it has been positive so far >> for submission I have this in the smtpd_client_restrictions settings of >> master.cf >> >> reject_rbl_client auth.spamrats.com=127.0.0.39 -- Life is endless possibilities, and there is choice!
