Dear Viktor,

Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:54:21PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>
>> > There is obviously a point where the server won't be capable of
>> > handling the load, always. But what are the odds with "just" a
>> > brute-force on passwords/accounts?
>> > Our outbound/internal mail gateway handles the traffic for +2K
>> > every-day users +28K occasional users. Millions emails per month. It
>> > handles also emails sent by applications. One of these app had a
>> > problem last October and tried to send +2M emails per day, for many
>> > days: the app authenticated on the mail server (sasl/dovecot) tried to
>> > send the mail, got bounced because recipient was non-valid, got
>> > disconnected, re-connected and tried again with next recipient, etc.
>> > Nobody noticed, no user complained, no performance impact at all. We
>> > only find out because of the postfix log volume increase.
>> > It's a virtual machine with 4 vcpu and 10GB RAM (most ram is used by
>> > antispam), it can handle way more: it runs postfix multi, does
>> > antispam/av filtering and dkim singing for outbound, handles mailing
>> > lists peaks of +60K messages, etc.
>> 
>> Wow amazing story! Your email volume/traffic is a thousand times bigger than
>> mine!
>
> Not surprising, when over a decade ago I set the Postfix servers for the
> Google IPO, each individual server (spinning rust not SSD) was capable
> of sustaining ~200 msgs/sec, which would be ~17M msgs/day if there were
> enough messages.
>
> In the meantime the corporate mail servers were handling 2M messages/day
> for ~80k users, for redundancy 4 nodes 2 each at 2 sites, any one would
> have handled all the load.  The main limiting factor was the CPU cost
> of content inspection, "normal" mail processing easily scaled to
> ~300/sec, but dropped to ~30/sec with content inspection.
>
> With SSD storage and modern CPUs, the peak performance of a Postfix
> server would be a few times higher.

Huwa... for a while i watched a movie like as <<Mission: Impossible>>!

Thank you for sharing good story INDEED...

Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee

-- 
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//

Reply via email to