Hi,
nobody is required to support or provide technologies just because you like them.
In the beginning of the "any website needs to be encrypted" campaign I didn't get the point behind. Finally I understood, that in some countries encrypted data transfers are observed by the government/regime and anybody doing so is suspicious. So the only valid point here is to produce as much (useless) encrypted data traffic as possible to give these people a chance to hide in between.
Actually we should have reached this because a lot of sites already offer encrypted versions and most browsers try to establish an encrypted connection if possible.
Within the EU we have additionally the GDPR, that protects private data (e.g. cookies, lol). So you may not use cookies if the connection is not encrypted.
For the postfix website I don't see any necessity to switch to an encrypted version. We don't have the cookie-problem here and there is already enough encrypted traffic out there (to be realistic, the postfix web site is producing very little traffic on global scale I assume).
So it would be nice to have for solidarity but if there are arguments against (like the actual setup with the provider) it's still ok and working and safe.
Groetjes Claus -- Claus R. Wickinghoff, Dipl.-Ing. using Linux since 1994 and still happy... :-)
