On 12/01/2022 02:34, raf wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Joachim Lindenberg
<postfix-us...@lindenberg.one> wrote:
Hello Levi,
In my experience the best spam protection is a custom domain with an email
server supporting gray-listing (postfix does). I receive almost no spam on my
own domain but plenty on addresses hosted by public email providers like
live.com (despite the rigorous black listing of outlook.com).
W.r.t. virus filtering I prefer to bet on user education rather than any tool.
Regards, Joachim
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org <owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org> Im
Auftrag von Levente Birta
Gesendet: Tuesday, 11 January 2022 13:34
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Betreff: OT: comercial spam filterin
Hi
My apologies for the off topic.
I would like to ask the users here if someone using a commercial spam
and/or virus filtering with postfix and which one?
Thanks
Levi
Hi,
Most people are probably using free software rather
than commercial. e.g., amavis, spamassassin, postgrey,
rspamd, postfix's builtin postscreen. I use amavis,
spamassassin, postgrey, and my own procmail monster.
People say good things about rspamd. I also use
OpenDKIM and OpenDMARC, but only to add headers.
Postscreen in Postfix probably does everything that
postgrey does and more. RBLs are also a thing but some
of them can block a lot of solicited commercial email
as well as unsolicited commercial email.
Sorry if you already knew all that, and only wanted
information about commercial software.
I knew and using all of that. Almost.
Using spamassassin, but maybe I will try rspamd. I'm curious how the
neural network module perform :)
The past 4-5 years I used Eset linux mail security. But now is EOL and
they don't have nothing to replace. It was an additional layer and a
very good one.
Thanks!
cheers,
raf
