The other ??? item,
"Session Resumption Tickets: yes, ID resumption test failed, pls
report"
I've not found any guidance on at all, yet.
For postfix, do I care?
And if so, what/where is a fix?
did find this comment at SF,
"Certbot — Post-Handshake New Session Ticket arrived"
https://serverfault.com/questions/1034382/certbot-post-handshake-new-session-ticket-arrived#comment1349580_1034382
"You are using a server that supports TLS 1.3, and testing with
OpenSSL 1.1.1 which also does so. The secure-renegotiation extension (RFC5756) is no
longer used or needed in 1.3 because it no longer does any renegotiation, or even
resumption with prior secret. Yes there may be multiple 'tickets' in 1.3; the protocol is
changed so that they aren't really tickets, just saved PSKs. This is all explained in the
1.3 spec, RFC8446"
led eventually to this @ openssl ML, which is related (?)
"[openssl-project] OpenSSL 1.1.1 library(OpenSSL 1.1.0 compile) Postfix to
Postfix test"
https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-project/2018-April/000671.html
"The only interesting observations are:
* With TLS 1.3 a new session is generated even sessions are
resumed, because the server responds with a new ticket
in the event of session resumption. With TLS 1.2
sessions
that had sufficient remaining lifetime did not trigger
new
ticket generation on the server, and no new session was
stored on the client. This causes needless
wear-and-tear
on the external session cache in Postfix, since each
connection writes out a new session, replacing the one
it just used. Some might consider this a security
feature,
but it is not especially desirable with SMTP. Any
thoughts
about whether this could be tunable? It would have to
be
server-side tuning I think, since the client does not
know
why the server issued a new session, perhaps the old one
was not (or will soon not) be valid for re-use."
and downthread comes to some agreement, but I've missed what server-side
tunable knob in postfix to use, or if needed.
unclear if this is a red-herring, and can/should just be ignored in Postfix,
when tested by testssl ...