On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 12:34:20PM +0100, natan <na...@epf.pl> wrote:
> W dniu 23.12.2021 o 12:12, raf pisze:
> > That looks like it should be plenty of processes,
> > as long as the server can really support that many.
> >
> > You could test it with something like this:
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/env perl
> > use warnings;
> > use strict;
> > my $max_nprocs = 8000;
> > my $i = 0;
> > while ($i < $max_nprocs)
> > {
> > $i++;
> > my $pid = fork();
> > die "fork #$i failed: $!\n" unless defined $pid;
> > sleep(10), exit(0) if $pid == 0;
> > }
> > print "$i forks succeeded\n";
> >
> > For example, a VM here reports 7752 for ulimit -Su,
> > but the above script failed on the 3470th fork.
> >
> > cheers,
> > raf
> >
> in machine with postfix
>
> time ./1.py
> 12000 forks succeeded
>
> real 0m1,365s
> user 0m0,088s
> sys 0m1,276s
That looks like it should be enough.
Sorry, I'm out of ideas.
cheers,
raf
