Bob Proulx:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Bob Proulx:
> > > Any ideas on why postfix would not be running after such an event on
> > > two of the systems but okay on the others?
> >
> > LOGS. Postfix logs a sh*load, including processes that fail to
> > start. If the systems were unable to record this in LOGS, then you
> > will never know.
>
> I guess we will never know then. Because I showed the relevant logs.
> I would have showed more but the large message was rejected due to
> size. But there wasn't anything more clueful than the logs I showed.
Postfix was only the messenger of bad news. It does not
spontaneously self-destruct.
Wietse
