Thanks Noel

I can work with the linux team to have it tested and upgraded since I do not 
control the OS portion of the servers.
I did postmap the transport file to no avail.

Here is the results of postfix -n:



alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
allow_min_user = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
data_directory = /var/lib/postfix
debug_peer_level = 2
debugger_command = PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin xxgdb 
$daemon_directory/$process_name $process_id & sleep 5
html_directory = no
inet_interfaces = all
inet_protocols = ipv4
local_recipient_maps =
mail_owner = postfix
mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq.postfix
manpage_directory = /usr/share/man
message_size_limit = 20480000
mydestination =
mydomain = domain.com
myhostname = postfix.domain.com
mynetworks = 0.0.0.0/0
newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix
proxy_interfaces =
queue_directory = /var/spool/postfix
readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.6.6/README_FILES
relay_domains = $myhostname, hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains
relayhost = [xxx.outlook.com]:25
sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.6.6/samples
sender_canonical_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/sender_canonical
sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix
setgid_group = postdrop
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access 
check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/client_access.cidr reject
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550



Anywhere else to look?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org <owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org> On 
Behalf Of Noel Jones
Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 1:34 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: new install ignores transport file?

CAUTION: This email was sent from an external sender. Do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

On 8/5/2021 12:07 PM, Gomes, Rich wrote:
> Good day
>
> I have a newly built postfix server which is ignoring it's transport file and 
> is querying DNS for MX records instead.
> I have googled the issue but only come up with "how to use transport file" 
> articles.
> The /etc/postfix directory was copied from our Production relay and is 
> working as expected.
> I have verified the transport file is populated with the correct destination 
> relays, which are different from the internal MX record.
> I have updated the transport. db file using postmap and there is no change.
> I have verified the correct line to reference a transport file is in main.cf 
> and I have restarted the postfix service several times.
>
> Since everything appears to be correct, I am thinking this may be a 
> versioning difference?
>
> Here are the OS and postfix versions on the servers:
>
>
> Existing Production Server:
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago) mail_version = 
> 2.6.6
>
>
>
> New Server:
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.9 (Maipo) mail_version = 
> 2.10.1
>
>
>
> Could this be a versioning issue or do I need to look somewhere else?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>

This is almost certainly a config issue on your part.

First, version 2.10.1 is very very old. Support for that version ended in 2016. 
The current stable release is 3.6.2. I would strongly suggest upgrading to a 
supported version. At this time, the oldest supported version is 3.3.19, but if 
you're upgrading go with the current version.

That said, there shouldn't be any show-stoppers in your postfix 2.10, but your 
support here may be limited.

If you moved your hash files, it's possible the new system has a 
newer/incompatible version. Make sure to "postmap" all your db files.

Things may be installed in different directories on the new system.
Verify directory paths referenced in postfix main.cf are correct.

Use "postconf -n" to verify the settings are what you expect, and check the log 
files for warning and errors. General debugging info here:
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postfix.org%2FDEBUG_README.html&amp;data=04%7C01%7CGomes-Rich%40aramark.com%7C511efd1a0cc54c140f8e08d958373224%7Cb1519f0f2dbf4e21bf34a686ce97588a%7C0%7C0%7C637637816351528057%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=dYT8dejZ090zplbOeQXz1IH%2BbRvdvV%2B83JunmA2sRkE%3D&amp;reserved=0

If you need more help, please see:
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.postfix.org%2FDEBUG_README.html%23mail&amp;data=04%7C01%7CGomes-Rich%40aramark.com%7C511efd1a0cc54c140f8e08d958373224%7Cb1519f0f2dbf4e21bf34a686ce97588a%7C0%7C0%7C637637816351528057%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=X74i%2FOL8xljzgyVV5EVlgydriN7R3zhZVyzZ%2B2V2MZM%3D&amp;reserved=0



   -- Noel Jones

Reply via email to