* Wietse Venema:
What problem are you trying to solve?
On 07.04.21 22:35, Ralph Seichter wrote:
Milters A, B and C in my example scenario can trigger asynchronous
actions in backend systems, the results of which become available only
after a delay caused by processing, which takes about 3 minutes. These
results are required by milter D, and it is not feasible to have Postfix
hold the original sender's session in an active state for this amount of
time.
it it's not feasible to hold sender's session, use D as content_filter, not
milter.
the main reason for milters is to be able to hold sender's session so you
can reject mail during SMTP transaction.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I intend to live forever - so far so good.
