On 10 Dec 2020, at 03:58, Vincent Pelletier <plr.vinc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:38:30 +1300, David Neil <Postfix@rangi.cloud> wrote:
>> Evidently we share frustration.
> 
> This is an understatement :) .
> Just seeing the subject of your original email made my blood pressure
> go all over the place.

One of the early blacklists was called SPEWS and it had a similar model as what 
it appears this one is using, where it decides to ban and tire network as 
ounative punishment for one spammer. They also did not have a good track record 
of dealing rationally with people who were not spammers and generated a lot of 
ill-will. I was on a fixed IP on a class C that was listed by slews because a 
user hacked into an entirely different system on a different domain and sent 
out a bunch f spams. The ISP shut down the connection quickly, leaned the 
system, and the spam stopped. The entire class C was listed for months.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_Prevention_Early_Warning_System>

I'd check mxtoobox and check your blacklsits listing there. If there are other 
non FABEL hits, then definitely try to fix your setup If it's just label, move 
along.
 
> I'm not sure what the "silent drop" is about...
> Some recipient server is setup to pretend-accept your emails when you
> are listed on that DNSBL ?

Some setups do this. Certainly before psotscreen if I received mail and SA 
scored it above a certain level the mail was effectively silently dropped. (Not 
in point of fact, it was recoverable for a week, just in case, but it was not 
delivered to the target account).

I've seen a lot of comments about lack or response, lack of consistency, and 
lack of removal from this RBL. Sadly, there's nothing you can do about a 
incompetent RBL or the people who use it.

-- 
'People need vampires,' she [Granny] said. 'They helps 'em remember
        what stakes and garlic are for.' --Carpe Jugulum

Reply via email to