Re: Accessing the sending user from a canonical(5) table

[Wietse Venema]

Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 1:43 PM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> A suffix looks like a good solution to me.
> > 
> > On second consideration, I think I'll go for "uid:".

As in uid:123345.

        Wietsse