Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Wietse Venema wrote in
>  <4bcnlx0tr4zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
>  |Steffen Nurpmeso:
>  |> Wietse Venema wrote in
>  |>  <4bcgr00pr0zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
>  |>|Steffen Nurpmeso:
>  |>|> It would be great if a hook could be called for such events.  Even
>  |>|> a simple fork+detach+exec+forget approach would be really great,
>  |>|> with an event indicator and an IP address as an argument.
>  |>|
>  |>|We don't do ad-hoc special-case solutions.
>  |> 
>  |> Yes.  That is good.  But, on the other hand, trying to create
>  |> a very generic interface can become an endless undertaking.
>  |
>  |No, it doesn't. But, as this thread has already demonstrated, doing
> 
> Yes, i tend to disagree. 

That's fine. I guess that's why millions use my software.

        Wietse

Reply via email to