On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 01:16:25PM +0300, Sergey Urushkin wrote:
> So, this would be great if we had a way to specify additional filter for
> special_result_attribute query. Something like this in our case:
>
> special_query_filter=(!(useraccountcontrol:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))
>
> and the resulting query would be:
> (&(dn={dn from special_result_attribute}){special_query_filter})
>
> I guess it's not so hard to implement.
Sounds potentially reasonable, are you in a position to contribute a
patch along those lines? Should the special_result_query_filter support
any expansions (%1, %2, %d, ...)?
Basically, should the optional query component be static or not?
--
Viktor.
