On Mon, Jul 27, 2020, 6:59 PM Wietse Venema, <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> Ian Evans: > > Looking at the Postfix logs it appears the email was sent to the same ip > > address for cp20.com: > > > > Jul 27 15:14:22 carson postfix/smtp[13747]: 9323F20309D: to=<[some coded > > letters that probably translate to the publicist email]@cp20.com>, > relay= > > mail.cp20.com[216.24.225.10]:25, delay=0.3, delays=0.01/0.01/0.06/0.22, > > dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6. > > 0 message received) > > So, your Postfix did send your message to cp20.com. > > cp20 forwarded it to some domain hosted at digitalhit.com. Because > of the forwarding, the spf checks failed. > > cp20 also made some header and body modifications so that DKIM > checks failed. > > Wietse > Just to clarify (and maybe I obfuscated incorrectly) but _I'M_ digitalhit.com. If I did make it more unclear with the obfuscation, I'm sorry. I would think responding to a group email service would forward to the publicist. Not sure why it would forward anything to me (digitalhit.com). I guess I need to dig around and see if I can find a tech contact for cp20.com. And I'm assuming a workaround would be sending a new mail directly to the publicist so as to avoid the return reply path. >
