On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:56:45AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:

> I don't see the change 20200108 reflected in the transport(5) man page.

The HISTORY file writeup was:

    20200108
    
           UI cleanup: SMTP (and LMTP) client support for a list of
           nexthop destinations separated by comma or whitespace. These
           will be tried in the specified order. The list form can be
           specified in relayhost, transport_maps, default_transport,
           and sender_dependent_default_transport_maps.  Examples:
           "relayhost = foo.example, bar.example", and "default_transport
           = smtp:foo.exmple, bar.example". Files: smtp/smtp.c,
           smtp/smtp_connect.c, trivial-rewrite/resolve.c, proto/transport,
           proto/postconf.proto, global/mail_params.c.

Which explains that the feature is a change in the SMTP/LMTP nexthop
syntax, NOT a change in the transport syntax.

> While this isn't a problem per se, I have been using this form for
> internal routing:
> 
> exchange.charite.de   
> exchange:s-mx14-ht01.charite.de,exchange:s-mx14-ht02.charite.de

This looks wrong, it should be :

    exchange.charite.de   exchange:s-mx14-ht01.charite.de,s-mx14-ht02.charite.de

One "exchange" transport, multiple nexthop hosts.

> This worked until this morning 09:10:59 (I 've been using 20200112, I
> upgraded now, though):

Not sure why it worked, it wasn't supposed to. :-)

-- 
    Viktor.

Reply via email to