On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:56:45AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > I don't see the change 20200108 reflected in the transport(5) man page.
The HISTORY file writeup was: 20200108 UI cleanup: SMTP (and LMTP) client support for a list of nexthop destinations separated by comma or whitespace. These will be tried in the specified order. The list form can be specified in relayhost, transport_maps, default_transport, and sender_dependent_default_transport_maps. Examples: "relayhost = foo.example, bar.example", and "default_transport = smtp:foo.exmple, bar.example". Files: smtp/smtp.c, smtp/smtp_connect.c, trivial-rewrite/resolve.c, proto/transport, proto/postconf.proto, global/mail_params.c. Which explains that the feature is a change in the SMTP/LMTP nexthop syntax, NOT a change in the transport syntax. > While this isn't a problem per se, I have been using this form for > internal routing: > > exchange.charite.de > exchange:s-mx14-ht01.charite.de,exchange:s-mx14-ht02.charite.de This looks wrong, it should be : exchange.charite.de exchange:s-mx14-ht01.charite.de,s-mx14-ht02.charite.de One "exchange" transport, multiple nexthop hosts. > This worked until this morning 09:10:59 (I 've been using 20200112, I > upgraded now, though): Not sure why it worked, it wasn't supposed to. :-) -- Viktor.