Many thanks in advance for all your efforts in this regard, Wietse!
On 12/31/19 5:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Willy Tarreau:
>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 08:21:05AM +0100, Tam?s G?rczei wrote:
>>> Thanks Wietse, this is what I thought and found out during my
>>> experiments,That said, now knowing that only v1 is supported, may I ask
>>> whether you have considered implementing v2 support? I'm about to
>>> migrate to a setup where I'm behind a load balancer that only speaks v2.
>> Maybe you can try to implement v2 support ? Parsing v2 when v1 is already
>> supported is quite easy, especially at the same level of support (i.e. no
>> TLV field support for TLS or whatever). You can have a look at
>> conn_recv_proxy() in haproxy:src/connection.c which supports the two
>> versions. Feel free to steal any code I wrote there, if that helps :-)
> I'm looking into this, and a Postfix-quality implementation including
> tests(!) is going to take more than a few hours. Primarily, because
> v2 uses a binary protocol, which complicates everything. I'll put a
> few hours in today.
>
> Wietse
