>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Stracchino <ph...@caerllewys.net> writes:
Phil> On 4/23/19 2:40 PM, lists wrote: >> I would investigate using rspamd rather than spamassassin. At the moment >> I run neither since I have settled upon a nice mix of RBLs and check the >> reverse pointer. That Perl code to get rid of dynamic domains really >> helps nuke spammers. >> >> Spamassassin tends to use a lot of memory. When I was using it, I had it >> on a rather memory limited VPS and actually needed to use VM. Phil> I'm using rspamd myself, though it's clear I still have a lot to Phil> learn about configuring and training it. I used to use DSpam, Phil> and was getting excellent results with it — something over Phil> 99.97% accuracy — but it was abandoned and eventually became Phil> unmaintainable. I used to use dspam too and it worked great. Then when I setup my own VPS and postfix I tried using rspam, but I ended up dropping it because it never seemed to actually work. Once I put spamassassin in place, it just got better. It's still not perfect of course... but not terrible either. John
