On April 20, 2019 4:23:09 AM UTC, Peter <pe...@pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >On 20/04/19 3:57 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Not at all. The unusual aspect of this case is the originator >including Sender in the mail sent to the list. Don't do that and it's >all fine. > >So we should expect people to do what we think is best practice instead > >of what is recommended in the appropriate standards documents, and when > >they don't it's their fault for actually following the standards? >Ummm, ok. Sigh. No. That's not what I wrote at all. RFC 6376 suggests signing the sender field if present. It says nothing about adding it. For that you want RFC 5322, Section 3.6.2. (Originator Fields). Unless a third party is transmitting mails to a mailing list on your behalf, it shouldn't be there. Scott K
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Ma... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Majord... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Ma... B. Reino
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list an... Ralph Seichter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Majordomo regar... Peter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Majordomo ... Richard Damon
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Majord... Peter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Ma... Peter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Ma... Scott Kitterman
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list an... Peter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing li... Scott Kitterman
- Re: Big problem with this mailing li... Peter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing li... Scott Kitterman
- Re: Big problem with this mailing li... @lbutlr
- Re: Big problem with this mailing li... Ralph Seichter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing li... Bill Cole
- Re: Big problem with this mailing li... Ralph Seichter
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Majord... Bill Cole
- Re: Big problem with this mailing list and Ma... Richard Damon