No no. That line is quite different.

-D is not it.
Are you starting master with a -D maybe.

Like /use/sbin/master -D type of thing?

Turn on verbose output with a -v and see if you can catch it.




-----



> On 11 Dec 2018, at 3:49 pm, Marco Fioretti <marco.fiore...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Robert,
> there is no "-D" in master.cf, only "=D".
> IN any case... I don't know what to answer.
> 
> By this I mean that I put together this procmail line in master.cf:
> 
> procmail  unix  -       n       n       -       -       pipe  -o
> flags=D user=myvmail_user argv=/usr/bin/procmail -t -m
> USER=${recipient} EXTENSION=${extension}
> /usr/local/etc/procmailrc.common
> 
> (with "=D", not "-D") maybe 10 years ago, in order to filter all
> incoming email with procmail, following advice from procmail and
> postfix mailing lists. Since then, and until 4 days ago, it had always
> worked as expected, and never given me reasons to remember its
> existence. Do you mean that the "flags=D" setting is obsolete in the
> current version of postfix?
> 
> Marco
> Il giorno mar 11 dic 2018 alle ore 16:36 Robert Chalmers
> <racu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>> You may actually have a -D where you should have a -d ????
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11 Dec 2018, at 14:57, Marco Fioretti <marco.fiore...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> here it is:
>> 
>> postconf -Mf
>> smtp       inet  n       -       n       -       -       smtpd
>> submission inet  n       -       n       -       -       smtpd
>>   -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>>   -o 
>> smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
>> smtps      inet  n       -       n       -       -       smtpd
>>   -o smtpd_tls_wrappermode=yes -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
>>   -o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
>> 628        inet  n       -       n       -       -       qmqpd
>> pickup     fifo  n       -       n       60      1       pickup
>> cleanup    unix  n       -       n       -       0       cleanup
>> qmgr       fifo  n       -       n       300     1       qmgr
>> tlsmgr     unix  -       -       n       1000?   1       tlsmgr
>> rewrite    unix  -       -       n       -       -       trivial-rewrite
>> bounce     unix  -       -       n       -       0       bounce
>> defer      unix  -       -       n       -       0       bounce
>> trace      unix  -       -       n       -       0       bounce
>> verify     unix  -       -       n       -       1       verify
>> flush      unix  n       -       n       1000?   0       flush
>> proxymap   unix  -       -       n       -       -       proxymap
>> smtp       unix  -       -       n       -       -       smtp
>> relay      unix  -       -       n       -       -       smtp
>>   -o fallback_relay=
>> showq      unix  n       -       n       -       -       showq
>> error      unix  -       -       n       -       -       error
>> retry      unix  -       -       n       -       -       error
>> discard    unix  -       -       n       -       -       discard
>> local      unix  -       n       n       -       -       local
>> virtual    unix  -       n       n       -       -       virtual
>> lmtp       unix  -       -       n       -       -       lmtp
>> anvil      unix  -       -       n       -       1       anvil
>> scache     unix  -       -       n       -       1       scache
>> procmail   unix  -       n       n       -       -       pipe -o flags=D
>>   user=myvmail_user argv=/usr/bin/procmail -t -m USER=${recipient}
>>   EXTENSION=${extension} /usr/local/etc/procmailrc.common
>> here it
>> Il giorno mar 11 dic 2018 alle ore 15:51 Robert Chalmers
>> <racu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>> 
>> Do a
>> postconf -Mf
>> 
>> to show your master.cf file configuration.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11 Dec 2018, at 14:47, Robert Chalmers <racu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Where/what is the -D in your master.cf file ????
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11 Dec 2018, at 14:35, Marco Fioretti <marco.fiore...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> /etc/postfix/master.cf: unused
>> parameter: flags=D"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Robert Chalmers
>> https://robert-chalmers.uk
>> aut...@robert-chalmers.uk
>> @R_A_Chalmers
>> 

Reply via email to