On 12/6/2018 10:46 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2018, Noel Jones wrote: > >> Wild guess: some spammer used your own address as sender, and the >> connection was rejected by some of your spam controls, probably an >> rbl. > > Noel, > > There are certainly many rejected by a couple of rbls as well as > by other > postfix UCE checks. Why these two were listed separately by > pflogsumm is not > obvious when I look at the list grep returned. > > Thanks, > > Rich
Possibly there are more clues in pflogsumm's output, such as the heading or something else. Depending on how compact you've set the output, it might be hard to identify with the existing information. The heading may give the clue about which rule or control rejected these. Maybe re-running pflogsumm with increasing detail will give hints about which two rejections it's referring to. -- Noel Jones
