On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Bill Cole wrote: > > Is there any particular significance to the complete lack of its > > mention on: > > > > http://www.postfix.org/addon.html > > Certainly. It is very strong evidence that no one has ever bothered > emailing Dr. Venema to ask for its inclusion there. That option struck me as improbable, but ok. > > which _seems_ to list 'everything else' out there ... or, for that > > matter, anywhere else on the site. > > I think that overstates how comprehensive that list is. Hence the _underscore_ & 'quote' :-) Thx for the comments!
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassassin/c... Andreas Schamanek
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassass... Stefan Bauer
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassassin/c... Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassassin/clamav... Ralph Seichter
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassassin/clamav... Bill Cole
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassassin/c... pg151
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassass... Wietse Venema
- Re: best practice - integrating spamassass... Bill Cole
- Re: best practice - integrating spamas... pg151
- RE: best practice - integrating spamassassin/clamav... Kevin Miller