Hi Matus
I think you are right, that should be enough. What we've seen is some
receipients sort of 'goes dark', and they just timeout on the SMTP connection,
and the troubleling for us is that it's not 'small companies' that does
this.And getting through to some of the larger mail companies with less than
absolute proof is very hard because their first reaction is always 'we don't
have a problem', and then our customers think that we have a problem, and so
far we've been able to show high likeliness of it not being us, also because
there is no change after restart of postfix / server etc. But all of the sudden
the problem disappears, sometime after we contact the receipient company, and
ask if they have problems.
What should I set to get these extra lines shown?
Den onsdag den 17. oktober 2018 12.08.22 CEST skrev Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<uh...@fantomas.sk>:
On 17.10.18 08:18, K F wrote:
> I think that it has to be all receipients.The problem is that if we get
> reports about maildelivery it's after the fact, and so far we've not found
> the problem here, but rather in 'the other end', and thus it makes it more
> difficult to 'prove' if we don't have smtp actions in the log as well.
simple SMTP log containing somnething like
"status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1539769875 s18-v6si13395678wrm.42 - gsmtp)"
"Queued mail for delivery"
"Message 307087686 accepted"
should be enough.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
