On 1/23/2018 4:20 PM, Voytek wrote:
> On Wed, January 24, 2018 8:47 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> 
>> Find the error in the postfix log for the user's IP address.  The
>> postfix error may not be the same as what the user is presented with.
> 
> 
> Noel,
> 
> thanks
> 
> I can only see this, am I using correct search criteria though ??
> 
> # grep '110.170.19.146' /var/log/maillog | grep error
> Jan 23 20:12:45 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: SSL_accept error from
> 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146]: lost connection
> 

You should grep for "reject:", not error:


> and
> 
> # grep '110.170.19.146' /var/log/maillog | grep "Jan 23 20:12"
> Jan 23 20:12:44 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: connect from
> 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146]
> Jan 23 20:12:45 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: SSL_accept error from
> 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146]: lost connection
> Jan 23 20:12:45 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: lost connection after STARTTLS
> from 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146]

a connection fails STARTTLS.

> Jan 23 20:12:45 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: disconnect from
> 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146] ehlo=1 starttls=0/1
> commands=1/2
> Jan 23 20:12:52 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: connect from
> 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146]
> Jan 23 20:12:53 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: Anonymous TLS connection
> established from 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146]:
> TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
> Jan 23 20:12:54 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: 0F2D062B9553:
> client=110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146],
> sasl_method=PLAIN, sasl_username=h...@tld.com.au
> Jan 23 20:12:58 geko postfix/smtpd[15596]: disconnect from
> 110-170-19-146.static.asianet.co.th[110.170.19.146] ehlo=2 starttls=1
> auth=1 mail=1 rcpt=10 data=1 quit=1 commands=17



and a few seconds later STARTTLS succeeds, and that IP successfully
sends mail from user hr@ to 10 recipients.

Are there many users on that same IP via a NAT?



  -- Noel Jones

Reply via email to