@lbutlr:
> On 1 Jan 2018, at 11:18, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> >=20
> > @lbutlr:
> >> On 31 Dec 2017, at 16:41, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
> >>> Perhaps "are no longer part of the default Postfix install. If you =
> are =3D
> >> not using them, they may be removed."?
> >=20
> > Per my previous email, Postfix 3.3 as distributed by me never reports
> > the 'access' file as obsolete.
>
> The current version of 3.3 does not. I was testing against the September =
> version previously but have now installed the current build:
>
> postfix 3.3-20171229:
> /usr/local/etc/postfix/aliases /usr/local/etc/postfix/canonical
> /usr/local/etc/postfix/generic /usr/local/etc/postfix/relocated
> /usr/local/etc/postfix/transport /usr/local/etc/postfix/virtual
What is the above list of pathnames? Is that output from 'postconf
upgrade-configuration' or some other command?
I frequently install Postfix on a development machine, and I would
certainly have noticed messages about an obsolete 'access' file
(the access file on my development machine dates from 2005).
Wietse
