Hi all! Thanks to Wietse for Postfix, I still love the wrappers…
Let me first quote to a past (7 years ago) subject, where I found the one and only explanation for a problem I'm encouting : >> I am running majordomo with postfix for a number of email list, and I >> have some trouble tracking down bounces. I thought that if I could have some >> customized Received: headers with the envelope receiver logged >> eg by "for <user>" then I would be able to track some mutating adressees. >> Seems like some postfixes do that, but mine does not. >> I could not find something on it in the documentation or via google. > > Postfix logs "Received..for <recipient>" only if there is exactly > one recipient. Otherwise there would be a privacy violation of > BCC recipients, including the addresses of mailing list members. I use the "for <myrecipient>" information to deliver the messages in the right folder of a catch-many adresses mailbox. In case the <myrecipient> address is in BCC, and the main recipient is not managed by my MTA (aka not in mydestination), there's no problem : the cleanup process calls back the complete Received header and I get what I need in the mail delivered to my catch-many adresses mailbox. NB: there's no mention of <myrecipient> in the message received by the main recipient. But if the main recipient's domain is managed by postfix, the <myrecipient> address still in BCC, the Received header called back by the cleanup process is truncated. And now I know why ! So here's my question : Why can't I get no mention of <myrecipient> in the message received by the main recipient (as in the first case) in the second case ? And , if there's no way to get it, is there any way I can split the message in two ? I already spent a few hours tracing the problem, playing with 'cleanup -v' and filtering the logs, I'd be happy trying any suggested method… Thanks! -- Olivier Le Monnier — ☎ 023156.6209 Pôle Infrastructures — SysAdmin Linux Direction du Système d'Information Université de Caen Normandie
