Wietse Venema:
> J Doe:
> > Hi Wietse,
> >
> > > On Nov 11, 2017, at 8:37 AM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > J Doe:
> > >> Is this really the only way to fix this, though ? This feels a bit like
> > >> a workaround as opposed to the ?correct? solution (assuming that there
> > >> is a ?more correct? solution).
> > >
> > > Why bother with all this? The database is synced without error.
> > > It is in a consistent state. Only the close operation complains
> > > because of some DB bug. This does not affect correctness.
> >
> > Thanks for your reply.
> >
> > When Googling for this problem, ...
>
> Why bother. All data is safe. Let the computer ignore the message
> if it bothers you.
Or you can use 'lmdb:' instead 'btree:'. LMDB support was added in Postfix 2.11.
It's a totally different implementation.
Wietse
