On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Ralph Seichter <m16+post...@monksofcool.net> wrote: > On 08.11.17 23:45, Michael B Allen wrote: > >> many folks are apparently removing this header entirely. That seems >> sloppy to me but if you think otherwise, please tell me about it. > > 'Received' headers are used for diagnostic purposes. If one chooses to > discard these headers for authenticated email arriving over port 587 > (submission) to hide network details, user names or other information > considered sensitive, there is nothing "sloppy" or unusual about it.
>From a spam perspective, it doesn't really matter if the message is protocol correct. Does anyone else here think removing vs changing the origin 'Received' header would NOT have a negative impact wrt getting through hardcore spam filters?
