I'm reading about ciphers. Here
"why use "aNULL:!aNULL:" in Postfix default cipherlists?" http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/why-use-quot-aNULL-aNULL-quot-in-Postfix-default-cipherlists-td83301.html It talks about using anonymous ciphers when TLS policy is opportunistic == may. I get that. If instead you use MANDATORY tls policy, == encrypt, do you need to redefine the cipherlist to REMOVE that "aNull:-aNull"? Rob
