On 21 Jul 2017, at 15:50, Matthew Patton wrote:
since the user's intent is clearly obvious.
Not always.What is the clearly obvious intent of 192.0.2.8/28 or 192.0.2.31/27? How should Postfix guess which part of the CIDR notation is wrong?
- gratuitous failure on host address bits not zero Matthew Patton
- Re: gratuitous failure on host address bits not zero Wietse Venema
- Re: gratuitous failure on host address bits not zero Bill Cole
- Re: gratuitous failure on host address bits not ze... Matthew Patton
- Re: gratuitous failure on host address bits no... Stefan Monnier
