On 26 Jun 2017, at 8:03, Timothy D Legg wrote:

Hello,

Glad to be back here again. I migrated my server to a Raspberry PI and
away from my aging EeePC netbook that was running Ubuntu Server.  I am
virtual hosting email across a few domains I own using MariaDB to store the virtual aliases and virtual user's information. Ultimately, e-mail
is read within Squirrelmail.

If Dr. Venema's suggestion doesn't help, please see http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail

It is impossible for any of us to know what your config is and what is in your logs unless you tell us.

I have to admit, it took a risky path towards configuring (I blindly
copied the configuration files for Dovecot/Postfix from the old machine). Both packages on Raspbian were a downgrade to a lower version number. It
didn't work.  I was due to fly to another country and be offline for
several days and I had run out of time.  Since this only affected my
email, I decided to table the project during this time.

Upon returning, I found that the problem was that I failed to give the new SQL password to Dovecot, so it was impossible for me to authenticate via
IMAP.  Upon fixing that, I was able to log in and see new, very fresh,
e-mails, but none of the messages from June 9 through June 23 are present.

And most of those are very likely to be lost.

If you had Postfix itself delivering to the Maildirs, Dovecot's lack of access to user mapping would not prevent delivery. That you don't see those messages implies that you're using Dovecot to do delivery, either calling its LDA directly from Postfix or via LMTP. In that circumstance, delivery failure would normally cause Postfix to requeue the message and retry delivery later, up to a configurable period of time. When that has expired, Postfix will bounce the message to the sender.

To further complicate things, I'm using maildir to store the data which
isn't nearly as user readable as mbox.

That's quite subjective, as Maildir has one file per message and one directory per mailbox, with the names of both expressing useful metadata.

So I'm not certain where to look
to find staged e-mail that didn't end up where it was supposed to. Are these e-mails still located on my machine somewhere or did they get sent
down a /dev/null somewhere?

That's config-dependent but if they are anywhere, they would most likely be in Postfix's 'deferred' queue. You can check using the postqueue command and force an immediate delivery attempt for anything still being deferred.

In conclusion, this loss of e-mail was an educating experience because
since the misconfiguration was with Dovecot, I would have expected the
mail to be there waiting for me once I corrected Dovecot and established an IMAP connection. So in the end, I realize that I underestimated how
intimately Postfix and Dovecot interact with each other.

How intimate that interaction is actually varies a great deal based on config. For example, my personal system uses both but Postfix only relies on Dovecot for submission auth. Postfix itself (or for some users, procmail) delivers to Maildir trees for users whether Dovecot is running well, running broken, or dead. Since that system has only a handful of IMAP users, I have no need for the added complexity and overhead of a RDBMS. It's not clear to me whether you might have a similarly tiny number of users but if so you may find it useful to simplify the system, particularly because you are on a constricted physical platform.

Reply via email to