On Thu, May 25, 2017 05:23, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> This paper is a good read on email security. It goes into the various
> means that a man in the middle can reduce security, one of which is
> enabled by selecting opportunistic encryption. (Of which in all
> practicality you don't have a choice if you want maximum
> compatibility. I'm amazed at the lack of encryption in first world
> countries like Canada or the UK.)
>
Yes, I cannot image why members of the so called 'five-eyes'
consortium would not actively promote signal security among their
populations.
Must be an oversight.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrne mailto:[email protected]
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
