Dear Viktor,

Thanks for pointing out.

My config currently does not alter the defaults for the settings mentioned
by you.

Warm regards,

Nitin

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org
> wrote:

>
> > On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:30 AM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> [Nitin:]
> >> One reason why we would like to have Perfect Headers is that one
> >> of the domains is a B2C platform where many users can register. We
> >> want to reduce all possibilities (as much as we can) of our first
> >> email to these users from getting marked as Spam. So, we believe
> >> having a CA Trusted certificate might just add some more
> >> credibility in this scenario.
>
> It should perhaps be pointed out that certificates have a negligible
> (likely negative) impact on (outbound) deliverability because receiving
> servers rarely request client certificates from sending systems, and
> when they are requested, they are at best ignored.
>
> Some receiving systems shoot themselves in the foot and abort TLS
> handshakes with client-certificates they don't like for various silly
> reasons.  The mail is then often delivered in the clear instead.  The
> solution to that problem is to follow the advice in the Postfix docs
> and to NOT configure any client certificates.
>
>    http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_tls_cert_file
>
>    Do not configure client certificates unless you *must* present
>    client TLS certificates to one or more servers. Client certificates
>    are not usually needed, and can cause problems in configurations
>    that work well without them. The recommended setting is to let the
>    defaults stand:
>
>       smtp_tls_cert_file =
>       smtp_tls_key_file =
>       smtp_tls_dcert_file =
>       smtp_tls_dkey_file =
>       smtp_tls_eccert_file =
>       smtp_tls_eckey_file =
>
> We may at some point in the next year or two have a spec for
> DANE client TLSA records.  At that point, client certificates
> may start to be used for reasons other than to impede email
> delivery.  Broad use is at least a decade away...
>
> --
>         Viktor.
>
>

Reply via email to