How would a get a print out of email uses that fail DKIM, SPF, or both? A few months ago there was chatter about how to rewrite the subject header to indicate the SPF and DKIM status. Unfortunately nothing further. Further, how does DKIM prove the message wasn't altered? To my knowledge, SPF proves the message came from a qualified server and DKIM proves the FQDN is a match.
I agree about the DKIM signing. I get regularly authentication failures (forensic reports) when posting to this list. Propably because my domain is set to require mandatory DKIM signing and postfix list server isn't.
However, I don't think there should be any subject tags. |
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the... John Allen
- Re: Why no List-ID header in... Josh Good
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the postfix-users posts? Benny Pedersen
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the postfix-users po... Josh Good
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the postfix-user... Sebastian Nielsen
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the postfix-... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the post... Sebastian Nielsen
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the... Josh Good
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the... Benny Pedersen
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the... Juri Haberland
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the postfix-... lists
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the post... Bill Cole
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the... lists
- Re: Why no List-ID header in... Josh Good
- Re: Why no List-ID header in... Michael Ströder
- Re: Why no List-ID header in... Josh Good
- Re: Why no List-ID header in... Michael Ströder
- Re: [postfix-users] Why no List-... Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
- Re: [postfix-users] Why no L... Josh Good
- Re: [postfix-users] Why no L... Ralph Seichter
- Re: Why no List-ID header in the post... Josh Good