> On Feb 5, 2017, at 1:25 PM, James <postfix_trac...@trackivity.com> wrote:
>
> I guess my basic question here is "does check_helo_access, or
> check_helo_a_access, play nicely with cidr:table's when the helo/ehlo command
> presents an address literal?"
Support for cidr tables in check_helo_a_access applies only to domain names
not to address literals.
So it works when the "domain name" is just a dotted IPv4 string, but not
when it is enclosed in [] as an address literal.
Thus, with check_helo_a_access,
EHLO 127.0.0.1
will match a CIDR key of 127.0.0.0/8, but
EHLO [127.0.0.1]
will not.
--
Viktor.
