On 2016.11.15 11.32, Wietse Venema wrote:
> btb:
>> in the postconf(5) documentation, the format section says:
>>
>> The expressions "${name:value}" and "${name?{value}}" are replaced
>> with "value" when "$name" is empty. These forms are supported with
>> Postfix versions ? 2.2 and ? 3.0, respectively.
>>
>> should the ? in "${name?{value}}" be a :?
>
> Yes. This was corrected in Postfix 3.1.
it looks like it may have been missed in html/postconf.5.html and
proto/postconf.html.prolog, at least as of postfix-3.2-20161106.
-ben
