Re: [PATCH] unionmap error handling

[Roel van Meer]

Wietse Venema writes:

> while investigation unexpected bounces, I noticed that the unionmap did not
> handle errors of submaps properly. If a submap generated an error, the
> unionmap would not.
Cool. Can you also check how pipemap handles this case?

I checked and pipemap shows correct behaviour (e.g. if one of the submaps is
an LDAP map that returns an error then the map itself also returns that  
error).

Thanks,

Roel