Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Wietse Venema <postfix-users@postfix.org>:
> > Wietse Venema:
> > > Unlike DNS lookups, the access map lookup is a blocking operation,
> > > and if your tcp map takes 80ms to complete (a typical trans-atlantic
> > > query), then you can handle only 12 connections per second, and
> > > make postsceen the largest performance bottleneck on the system.
> > 
> > After starting work on postscreen by the middle of 2009, I soon
> > realized that I might have to add some postscreen-policy interface
> > for things that are too complex or that take too much time compared
> > to a quick access map lookup. Perhaps the time has come.
> > 
> > Basically this would be a very small subset of the SMTP server
> > policy protocol with just the network 5-tuple (source/destination
> > address/port, protocol, client concurrency), enough to do some
> > simple reputation work.
> > 
> > Perhaps it also makes sense for postscreen to make a postscreen-policy
> > call based on the information that it has collected with its dummy
> > SMTP engine.
> 
> That's great news! The reason Christian is using tcp tables is that there's no
> postscreen API to call external policy services at the moment. If there was
> he/we would be eager to use that instead.

Yes, I wanted the discussion to end on an optimistic note. Something to
work on in the train.

        Wietse

Reply via email to