> On May 20, 2016, at 1:42 PM, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote: > > The cidr: map is quite efficient. > > IIRC the last time someone performance tested the cidr: map type, > performance stayed high even with 10's of thousands of entries. (or > was it 100's of thousands?? whatever... it was a lot) > > You're a really long way from where you need to worry about the map > size.
Thanks so much for the quick response. This is precisely what I was looking for.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
