J?rg Backschues:
> Hello,
>
> I've set up a BCC map for archiving e-mails:
>
> # Archiving
> sender_bcc_maps = pcre:${config_directory}/bcc_sender.pcre
>
> bcc_sender.pcre:
> /(.*)@(.*)local\.domain/ archive_local.domain
>
> And I'm also using batv-tools/milter
> (<https://www.agwa.name/projects/batv-tools/>) as Milter:
>
> # milter: BATV
> smtpd_milters = unix:/batv-milter/batv-milter.sock
> non_smtpd_milters = unix:/batv-milter/batv-milter.sock
>
> If the original sender matches an entry in sender_bcc_maps, Postfix
> 2.11.0 appears to increment the recipient count.
How many recipients are there before the bcc action?
> After batv-milter changes the sender, Postfix seems to forget about
> the BCC map.
Postfix does not undo and redo the previous sender_bcc_maps action
with the new sender address. For the same reason that if a Milter
changes message content, then Postfix isn't going to undo and redo
the previous header/body_checks with the new message content.
> The message is not sent to the BCC map address and there is a
> recipient count mismatch.
>
> Mar 7 22:56:03 lnxs001 amavis[25031]: (25031-02) FWD from
> <[email protected]> -> <[email protected]>, 250 2.0.0 from
> MTA(smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 3qJtll50rzzFT
> Mar 7 22:56:03 lnxs001 postfix/qmgr[20665]: 3qJtll50rzzFT:
> from=<[email protected]>, size=1919, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
> Mar 7 22:56:03 lnxs001 postfix/qmgr[20665]: warning: 3qJtll50rzzFT:
> rcpt count mismatch (1)
>
> Is this a possible bug or does the batv-milter something wrong?
That would be a bug. I'd appreciate it if you could run the cleanup
server with the -v action and log what Postfix and batv-milter are
saying to each other. That would save me the time to duplicate your
setup.
Wietse
