On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 06:42:03AM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote:
> I do not want SNI to die but IMHO SNI is not for mail servers.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 01:26:06PM +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
> And SMTP has the big advantage, that you can define the name of the host in
> MX, so the name of the mail server can be independent from the domain of the
> email address.
>
> Simply wait a bit longer and maybe that issue solves itself :-)
Thanks for the moral support. I agree that SNI is not particularly
compelling for port 25. The more strongest arguments for SNI that
I've seen are for port 587 submission, where there's no MX indirection,
users' MUAs have statically configured SMTP servers.
So if someone has feedback on either of the candidate interfaces,
or even a better suggestion, I'd still like to hear it. Or is it
the case that all the users who wanted SNI support in Postfix, but
did not get it, are on the Exim list now?
--
Viktor.
