On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:31:40PM -0400, Mike McKoy wrote:
> OK this is how my header looks now. Is that almost perfection?
>
> I still see Received: from inform.mymodeltalk.com (localhost.localdomain
> [127.0.0.1]). Is that a HELO and is it a problem when sending bulk mail?
>
> Delivered-To: [email protected]
> Received: by 10.36.51.18 with SMTP id k18csp1587884itk;
> Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
> X-Received: by 10.140.92.114 with SMTP id a105mr12182236qge.79.1434403580350;
> Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
> Return-Path: <[email protected]>
> Received: from mymodeltalk.com (MyModelTalk.com. [52.0.148.79])
> by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fm10si9078365qcb.45.2015.06.15.14.26.19
> for <[email protected]>;
> Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected]
> designates 52.0.148.79 as permitted sender) client-ip=52.0.148.79;
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
> spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected]
> designates 52.0.148.79 as permitted sender)
> [email protected];
> dkim=neutral (no signature) [email protected]
> Received: from inform.mymodeltalk.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by mymodeltalk.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 66F36325DF
> for <[email protected]>; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:26:19 -0400 (EDT)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mymodeltalk.com;
> s=default; t=1434403579;
> bh=OGM/bfUY4Whfe/tpcKi0I7F2EHGQODP0ggYbOKGyYNk=;
> h=Date:To:From:Subject;
> b=laHc/AQFeT5Dlhx8hHz/jk2Lg7kSrO8VIU2eU5eABphe4EYV7O7bMOk7EhyC4hlic
> 4RveckMb7bMO1As6Ix4rG2nPa6AEjtBkgGn7sr/j2iBSzi0ThwChY73IW2+jzvxqOV
> 96Dp8clECIwn98JtyeSQiaMhk9Kpr3zZTi+DzALg=
There's nothing wrong with this, you should be all set. You could
also DKIM sign your mail when/if you find that to be useful.
--
Viktor.
