You are correct if I did post it others might have come to the same conclusion. Here it is:
*Contents of /etc/postfix/main.cf <http://main.cf/>* #inet_interfaces = $myhostname, localhost #inet_interfaces = $myhostname #inet_interfaces = $myhostname, localhost inet_interfaces = localhost,172.30.1.113 *Contents of /etc/postfix-immt/main.cf <http://main.cf/>* #inet_interfaces = all #inet_interfaces = $myhostname #inet_interfaces = $myhostname, localhost inet_interfaces = 172.30.1.65 -- Mike McKoy *404.590.7176* http://MyForeverHair.com http://www.MyModelTalk.com http://InCrowdUSA.net http://www.google.com/profiles/mikemckoy On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org > wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:12:02AM -0400, Mike McKoy wrote: > > > Viktor I posted one instance because only one wasn't functioning. > > That logic is flawed, often the reason an instance might not be > able to bind a particular adress:port is that some other instance > already binds that port, or a wildcard address:port. > > Perhaps you'd ruled that out already, but you need to post enough > detail for others to be able reach the same conclusions. > > -- > Viktor. >
