li...@rhsoft.net:
> is it intentional that if a message hits more than one Regex that it
> creates also more than once BCC like below? it's little bit surprising
Of course. If more than one header line matches the table, then
more than one action will execute(*).
Why is that surprising?
(*) The exceptions are REJECT and DISCARD which terminate further
table lookups because the decision is obviously final.
> because in all known cases the first rule hit's and the evaluation of
> the file is stopped
That is absolutely incorrect.
Wietse
> the intention of the "spamfilter+inbox...@rhsoft.net" is to get
> ham-train candiates collected in a seperate folder while the inbox is
> checked for spam-candidates
>
> /^X\-Spam\-Flag: Yes/ BCC spamfil...@rhsoft.net
> /^X\-Spam\-Report:.*(BAYES_50)/ BCC spamfilter+inbox...@rhsoft.net
>
