Am 12.02.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
No, I said:
make install name=value
without rpmbuild crap. I support make install only. I do not support
rcpmbuild crap.
interesting attitude in context of subject "rpmbuild and shared=yes"
Please stick to the supported interfaces:
make makefiles name=value...
make
make install name=value...
make upgrade name=value...
etcetera
Where is your "make" command without rpmbuild crap? I am willing
to provide support at that level. I do not provide support at the
level of RedHat, Debian, Solaris, *BSD, or Apple package managers
the *real problem* is that "make install" is *interactive* and the
non-interactive "make upgrade" can't work at all while "make install
-non-interactive" talks about "nothing to do for update"
"config_directory=%{postfix_config_dir}" is *notging else* than
"config_directory=/etc/postfix" and i replaced *long before* "make
install" will be called
the whole purpose of a rpmbuild is to install into an *always empty*
tree as ordinary user and after that pack that tree with all folders,
files and permissions into an archive
