Wietse Venema:
> Ralf Hauser:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following rule has served us well for a long time:
> > /^Subject:.*<Urgent\/>.*/ FILTER relay...
> >
> > Today, it missed the following
> > <<Feb 9 09:58:27 mail13 postfix/cleanup[8310]: A1D63200A290: warning:
> > header Subject:
> > =?iso-8859-1?Q?WG:_Jugement_int=E9gral_Frenner_Pierre_Alain,_13.11.1977_<Urg
> > e?=? =?iso-8859-1?Q?nt/>_TestABC_XYZ?= from mail01....>>
> >
> > It seems that outlook after approx. 55 characters terminates the encoding
> > and immediately restarts it. In the above sample it breaks the keyword
> > "Urgent" in 2 pieces.
> >
> > Is there a way to apply a FILTER relay on a subject pattern where the
> > subject is decoded??
>
> Postfix does not decode email. You could allow the "?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?"
> explicitly, as in the following "extended" PCRE pattern:
>
> /^Subject:.*<(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?
> U(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?
> r(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?
> g(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?
> e(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?
> n(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?
> t(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?
> \/(?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?)?>/x FILTER relay...
>
> but maintaining patterns like this is painful (the "x" toggles the
> PCRE extended flag as described in the pcre_table(5) manpage).
Forgot to quote the ?. The (?=\s+=?iso-8859-1?Q?) should be
(\?=\s+=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?). Do not change the "?" after the ")".
> Wietse
>
> > A similar discussion was already in
> > http://marc.info/?l=postfix-users&m=141047275418893&w=2 but in
> > the end was not solving the encoding question.
> >
> > Many thanks for any hints in advance
> >
> > Ralf
> >
> >
>
