LuKreme:
>
> > On Jan 31, 2015, at 4:55 PM, LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jan 31, 2015, at 4:23 PM, Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> LuKreme:
> >>> Jan 26 14:49:53 mail postfix/pipe[44273]: E64DA50D3A1:
> >>> to=<oq6+2nbq@*munged*.com>, orig_to=<oq6_2nbq@*munged*.com>,
> >>> relay=dovecot, delay=0.13, delays=0.1/0.01/0/0.03, dsn=5.1.1,
> >>> status=bounced (user unknown)
> >>
> >> That will produce backscatter. Why did you accept an unknown recipient?
> >
> > I don?t know, that?s what I was trying to find.
> >
> > Everything I have about queue ID E64DA50D3A1 in maillog was posted in the
> > original message.
> >
> > Oh, wait, i think I just found it in an old pre map. Off to test.
>
> Yes, the old PCRE map was the problem. IN trying to fix it, I went to change
> the recipient_delimiter
>
> $ postfix reload
> postfix/postlog: fatal: bad string length 2 > 1: recipient_delimiter = +_
> postsuper: fatal: bad string length 2 > 1: recipient_delimiter = +_
> mail /etc/postfix] $ postconf recipient_delimiter mail_version
> recipient_delimiter = +_
> mail_version = 2.11.3
No such problems here.
% bin/postconf mail_version recipient_delimiter
mail_version = 2.11.3
recipient_delimiter = +_
# bin/postsuper -v
# bin/postlog foo
postfix/postlog: foo
I suppose you have a Frankenstein Postfix installation, with some
parts coming from different bodies?
Wietse
