28. Jan 2015 19:28 by li...@rhsoft.net:
> maybe you need some numbers why the below config is good and greylisting > not needed > > peak day 2015/01 > > * postscreen rejects: 90000 > * spamassassin: 120 > * clamav: 15 > * delivered mail: 850 > > that are numbers for a single day > Okay that is very good! Numbers are good to see. And they make a clear story. Wow that is really good percents. So I think I leave alone the greylisting idea and the deep protocol tests. For the later steps of both Spamassassin & CLamav, to keep them less expensive too what recomends are there? Still the policyd or the spamc? I am starting to read the documents for these now with new eyes, not wanting the greylisting integrated or not. I am arriving to a good solution with these ideas. Asking with getting good answers here changes it for the better. I am seeing the documents are like a fat Oxford Dictionary. Many many words with official particular definitions. They are like a book for childs too, that it tells some very simple stories. But to write stories richly someday like Mr. Shakespeare we must have advise from old authors writing some bad books already in the past! :-)
