On 1/16/2015 2:48 PM, Eugene R wrote: > >> Sounds like you're trying to recreate deep inspection in postfix. >> Use SpamAssassin instead. > > Absolutely no deep inspection, no content inspection at all, just > more flexible / controllable chaining of smtpd restrictions. > > Best wishes > Eugene
So what's the end-goal here? You want to conditionally run some extra restrictions based on the outcome of prior restrictions? Some of the existing policy servers do weighted scoring, which gives very similar results. Conditional greylisting? Some of the existing greylisting daemons do that already. Lightweight greylisting? Postscreen after-220 tests do a good imitation of that. Add a bunch of extra info to the policy service protocol? Probably not going to happen without a compelling use-case. Most of the postfix built-in envelope tests are easily recreated in perl from the information already supplied. Not trying to be negative, just trying to understand. Thinking outside the box is what drives projects forward. -- Noel Jones
