On Wed, January 7, 2015 13:54, Jean Bruenn wrote: > > On 07/01/15 02:07, Jim Reid wrote: >> BTW, it's particularly unwise to adopt DLV to kludge around TLD >> registries or registrars who can't/won't support DNSSEC properly. >> This was the OP's rationale for going down that path. IMO the >> OP should switch to another registrar and let the slacker >> registrar know why they've lost the OP's business. > > I don't want to go offtopic but there seem to be still "many" > registrars which do not support dnssec. I for example asked > three different registrars in germany and got the same > answer - they're working on it, due to the little demand > they haven't implemented anything for that now. I am > sure that I'll be able to find a registrar in germany with the > same prices, a similar realtime API and dnssec support. > Still I would not like to switch after 10+ years without any > trouble, to another registrar - call me lazy if you want. >
This is exactly our situation. We presently use DLV. I can get our upstream registrar to manually add DS RRs for our .com, .net; and I believe our .org tlds. But they will not do so for our principal tlds that belong to .ca. Nonetheless, as we have many domains registered with them, and have been using them since 2000 March 26, we are reluctant to change providers. CIRA's answer is to change registrars. That is the easy out, for them. The difficulty being the administrative and financial costs of doing so for us. So, we await developments and in the meantime employ DLV. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3
